Evaluations
A test set for every AI feature, covering itinerary feasibility, policy accuracy, grounding, tone and refusals. It runs before every change and on a schedule after.
Services · Managed AI Operations
We run evaluations, monitoring, drift detection, cost control and incident response for the AI features in your travel business, whether we built them or not. Every month we sit down with you to show what changed and why.

Traditional software breaks loudly: an error page, a failed payment, an alert at 3 AM. AI features mostly don’t. They drift.
A model provider ships an update, and your concierge’s tone goes from warm to clipped. A supplier renames its room types, and the proposal generator keeps offering a suite that no longer exists. A trail closes for the season, and the assistant keeps recommending it because the closure lives in an email instead of a field. We call these phantom venues, and grounding travel AI in live data is how you prevent them. Meanwhile a retry loop doubles the month’s model spend before anyone opens the invoice.
None of this sets off an alarm. Travelers notice before you do.
Most travel businesses don’t have, and shouldn’t need, a full-time team watching for this. But someone has to, with a test set, a dashboard, a budget and a phone number. That holds whether the AI is a planner on a destination organization’s website, a guest assistant at a lodge or a proposal tool for travel advisors.
A test set for every AI feature, covering itinerary feasibility, policy accuracy, grounding, tone and refusals. It runs before every change and on a schedule after.
Latency, errors, groundedness, hand-off rates and traveler feedback, sampled and scored, with alerts tied to thresholds you approve.
Shifts in what travelers ask, what supplier data says and how models answer, flagged before they turn into complaints.
Budgets per feature, caching, model routing and usage alerts, so spend follows value instead of surprises.
Severity levels, runbooks and rollback for AI-specific failures: a wrong policy quoted, a phantom venue, a prompt-injection attempt.
A working session with your team covering what we measured, what we changed, what we recommend and what it cost.
How it works
We inventory your AI features, read their prompts and data flows, and measure current quality and cost, including features another vendor built.
We add tracing, build evaluation sets with your team, agree thresholds and connect alerts.
Daily checks, weekly evaluations and on-call incident handling under agreed severity levels.
The session where findings become decisions.
Checklist
What a typical month looks like once we're running.
Managed operations is quieter than a build. Success mostly looks like things not going wrong. By the end of the first quarter, clients typically have:
Side by side
We used to find out the planner was wrong when a visitor emailed us a screenshot. Now we hear about it on Tuesday morning, with the cause and a proposed fix already attached.
Questions
Yes. Much of the work is the same whoever built the feature: test sets, monitoring, cost and incidents. We start with a baseline, so you know what we're inheriting before we commit to quality targets.
A repeatable test. It's a fixed set of realistic inputs, such as a family asking for a gentle day near Santa Fe or a traveler asking about a cancellation, scored for what a good answer must and must not contain. How we evaluate an itinerary generator walks through one.
Response targets depend on severity and are set in your service terms. Our support page explains severity levels and channels. For urgent AI incidents, a feature can roll back automatically while a person investigates.
Yes, and the evaluation sets make it safer. We run the candidate model against the same tests, compare quality and cost, and switch only when the evidence supports it.
Only the engineers assigned to your account, under least-privilege access, with traveler data minimized or redacted in logs where possible. Our security practices and Responsible AI service go into detail.
Related
Tell us which AI features you run today and what worries you about them. We'll suggest what a baseline would measure first.